Neil Schwartzman skrev den 2013-05-06 14:58:
Disagreed. So long as abuse@ is working, the domain is compliant with
RFCs. There is nothing wrong with having an alternate address,
particularly since abuse@ tends to garner a ton of spam.
problem is to know what email to "spam" abuse reports to, no ?
olso why i suggested to ab...@example-from-spamassassin-maillist.pw
then just another domain, if that complains are then not handled then
its time to block sender domain in mta stage
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
