John Hardin skrev den 2013-05-06 18:08:
Sorry, I was assuming that abuse-alert@ was being offered *instead
of* rather than in addition to abuse@
no need to sorry, there is alot of admins that assume the same, only
rule is to start with abuse@
If there is a working abuse@ address that *isn't being ignored*,
they're compliant.
yes, admins dont need to guess what email to send to in the first place
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
