On May 5, 2013, at 7:04 PM, John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 May 2013, Benny Pedersen wrote: > >> John Hardin skrev den 2013-05-05 22:44: >> >> abuse-alert on any domain is not rfc compliant > > Agreed. Disagreed. So long as abuse@ is working, the domain is compliant with RFCs. There is nothing wrong with having an alternate address, particularly since abuse@ tends to garner a ton of spam. Neil Schwartzman Executive Director CAUCE - the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email Mob: (415) 361-0069 Skype: spamfighter666 SkypeIn: (303) 800-6345 Web: http://cauce.org Twitter: @cauce
