> > Nonsense. I had to score this list -2000 just to keep it from > scoring so darn high that it was hitting the 'automatic' > rejection at the SMTP gate before any of my whitelists could > function. Sometimes legit mail scores high. A 'truly clean > company' should be permitted to enjoy a 'whitelist' > bonus just in case its material *looks* like spam. > > But of course, the whole issue is defining 'truly clean', > especially when even the cleanest company and get hacked.... > > - C >
Charles, you would be better off properly whitelisting the SA mailing list... depending on your situation, possibly to and from... also possibly telling bayes to ignore those emails to and from as well... - rh
