McDonald, Dan a écrit : > On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 13:21 +0300, Sergey Kovalev wrote: >> mouss wrote: >>>> On 6-Jan-2009, at 08:51, Greg Troxel wrote: >>>>> I realize that HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI has or had a reasonable ruleqa >>>>> value. But, I wonder if SA should apply higher standards than that, and >>>>> not give negative scores to databases that don't behave reasonably. >>> meta DNS_FROM_DOB (0) >>> meta RCVD_IN_DOB (0) >>> meta URIBL_RHS_DOB (0) >>> >>> They weren't bringing anything, so I preferred to reduce the network >>> usage... >> I may be wrong, but I thought that "0" disables the rule, not "(0)". >> >> Probably I should re-read Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf(3). > > score 0 disables the rule. meta (0) always returns false. > So he is still querying the RBLs, but throwing the results on the floor. >
really? I see meta RCVD_IN_DSBL (0) in the updates. I doubt this means SA still queries dsbl. Can someone please clarify?
