On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Jon Trulson wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Anthony Peacock wrote:
I zeroed the scores for all of these rules about a year ago. They were
only hitting on SPAM emails and pushing them into the FN range.
I second that - habeas stopped being useful a long time ago (IMO of
course :). Just zero them out.
Erm. If they're hitting on nothing but spam, doesn't that mean you should
assign them a *positive* score? ;)
I didn't say they hit on nothing *but* spam :) I really have no idea
how much ham they hit, but I sure noticed it when spam was allowed
through because of it.
So I zero'd them out, and haven't missed them at all.
--
Happy cheese in fear | Jon Trulson
against oppressor, rebel! | mailto:j...@radscan.com
Brocolli, hostage. -Unknown | 4E2A 697F 66D6 7918 B684
| FEB6 4E98 16C1 25F8 A291