On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, John Hardin wrote:

On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Jon Trulson wrote:

On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Anthony Peacock wrote:

 I zeroed the scores for all of these rules about a year ago.  They were
 only hitting on SPAM emails and pushing them into the FN range.

  I second that - habeas stopped being useful a long time ago (IMO of
  course :).  Just zero them out.

Erm. If they're hitting on nothing but spam, doesn't that mean you should
assign them a *positive* score? ;)


  I didn't say they hit on nothing *but* spam :)  I really have no idea
  how much ham they hit, but I sure noticed it when spam was allowed
  through because of it.

  So I zero'd them out, and haven't missed them at all.

--
Happy cheese in fear                 | Jon Trulson
against oppressor, rebel!            | mailto:j...@radscan.com
Brocolli, hostage.       -Unknown    | 4E2A 697F 66D6 7918 B684
                                     | FEB6 4E98 16C1 25F8 A291

Reply via email to