LuKreme a écrit : > On 6-Jan-2009, at 08:51, Greg Troxel wrote: >> I realize that HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI has or had a reasonable ruleqa >> value. But, I wonder if SA should apply higher standards than that, and >> not give negative scores to databases that don't behave reasonably. > > > This has been brought up on the list in the past (there was a long > thread on it last February). The best suggestion I saw in that thread was > > score HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI -1.0 > score HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI -0.5 > score HABEAS_CHECKED 0 > > The other suggestion that seemed reasonable was setting all scores to > 0. Some people suggested setting the scores to positive numbers. Based > on my own mail, a small positive score for Habeas is reasonable: > > score HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI 0.5 > score HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI 1.0 > score HABEAS_CHECKED 0 >
I have # Disable Habeas meta HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI (0) meta HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI (0) meta HABEAS_CHECKED (0) # Disable Bonded Sender meta RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER (0) meta RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED (0) meta DNS_FROM_DOB (0) meta RCVD_IN_DOB (0) meta URIBL_RHS_DOB (0) They weren't bringing anything, so I preferred to reduce the network usage... > It's about 90% Spam for my own mailspool. It used to be used a lot more, > at least in my mail. A lot of commercial or semi-commercial > mailing-lists that I was on tried it out back around 2003-2005, iirc. > Since then, all have stopped using it. The last one to remove them was > the TidBITS mailing list which dropped them on 1-Jan-2007. Certainly > having the very low scores (are they still defaulting to -4.5 and -8.0?) > seems like a spectacularly bad idea. > > If you want the real history of Habeas in a nutshell, the company went > to hell when Anne Mitchell left (the same Anne Mitchell who was part of > MAPS back in the day). She's now at the Institute for Spam and Internet > Public Policy <http://www.isipp.com/about.php>. What habeas became > after she left was something quite different from what it had been under > her stewardship. > > Habeas were acquired by ReturnPath back in August. I however don't know what RP want to do with that...
