On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 13:21 +0300, Sergey Kovalev wrote: > mouss wrote: > >> On 6-Jan-2009, at 08:51, Greg Troxel wrote: > >>> I realize that HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI has or had a reasonable ruleqa > >>> value. But, I wonder if SA should apply higher standards than that, and > >>> not give negative scores to databases that don't behave reasonably. > > > > meta DNS_FROM_DOB (0) > > meta RCVD_IN_DOB (0) > > meta URIBL_RHS_DOB (0) > > > > They weren't bringing anything, so I preferred to reduce the network > > usage... > > I may be wrong, but I thought that "0" disables the rule, not "(0)". > > Probably I should re-read Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf(3).
score 0 disables the rule. meta (0) always returns false. So he is still querying the RBLs, but throwing the results on the floor. -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE #2495, CISSP #78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
