> Guys, if my mail server announces itself as mail.somename.com and has a
> PTR that matches. I can send mail out as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] as long as the MX record for the domain
> "anothername.com" reads as "mail.somename.com" 

You lucky: mine got one of that weird PTR that my ISP likes to use...

My ISP told me that I can handle the PTR name I like provided I buy at least a 
whole C class bunch. It is a bargain! :(


> The original questions was how do I write a header rule similar to
> below, to identify if the announce name and PTR name do not match?
> 
> header  LOCAL_INVALID_PTR2  Received =~ /from \S+ \(unknown /
> 
> 
> 
> thanks, 
> 
> Robert
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Peace he would say instead of goodbye....peace my brother.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 4:05 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Scoring PTR's 
> 
> >> 
> >> > > *cirencester.co.uk*(*c204131.adsl.hansenet.de*[213.39.204.131])
> >> 
> >> Clearly, the PTR used here indicates a dynamic IP address. That may
> prompt
> >> an immediate reaction. But Richard gave a good example:
> >> 
> >> Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [209.237.227.199])
> >> 
> >> There is really nothing score-worthy about that (spam-wise).
> >> 
> >> Your example, btw, on my server would be REJECT-ed for another
> reason,
> >> though:
> >> 
> >> Go away, spammer! [213.39.204.131]: "United Kingdom" [.uk HELO] !=
> >> "Germany" [.de PTR]"
> >> 
> >> In the strictest sense, I'm not allowed to do that, either. But my
> >> rationale is, that the connecting host's HELO is perpetrating a lie
> here
> >> that under any reasonable circumstance is just irreconcilable with
> the
> >> PTR (the MTA simply cannot be in both countries at the same time).
> >> 
> >> - Mark
> >> 
> >> 
> wouldn't it be possible for a .de hosting companyto host a .uk domain or
> vice versa?
> Of course I would not like to be hosted on an adsl link but that kis a
> different story
> 
> Wolfgang Hamann
> 
> 

Reply via email to