Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 10/24/2006 7:55 AM, John Rudd wrote:
Here's an example for one I got tonight (I got 3, but trashed the others
before thinking "I should send that as an example").
(i577A0BC3.versanet.de [87.122.11.195])
577A0BC3 is the hex encoding of the IP address, with no separators.
That may be spam-sign, but unless there's something more than what you're
showing it's not a standards violation.
Yes, not all of my tests are standards violations.
The point of the tests is: identifying likely spam-bots, and flagging
their messages for review.
