Robert,

I think what you might find more useful is to look at the "First Received Header Only" thread on this list from Oct 8th and 9th.

If you write the rule the way you plan to, you'll be checking _every_ received header. That's not good. For example, some end client does a SMTP-AUTH to their ISP's mail server, mail server sends to you. That's a good situation, you don't want to flag that. If that same end client connects to you, THEN you can to smack 'em down.


I was thinking about doing this in a plugin, because I have some extra DNS checks I want to do on that information (be sure the PTR record points to an A record, be sure that the A record resolves back to the relaying IP address). Then look to see if the hostname in question looks like a dynamic hostname.


In particular, you might want to look at variations of this pattern, to match against the X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted psudoheader:

/^\[ ip=(\d+)\.(\d+)\.(\d+)\.(\d+) rdns=\S*(0*(\1|\2|\3|\4)\S?){2,4}\S* [^\]]* auth= /

/^\[ [^\]]* rdns=\S*(dynamic|dsl|dial-?up|ppp|cable|dhcp|ddns|catv)/

/^\[ [^\]]* rnds=\s/


#1 looks for IP address within the hostname
#2 looks for words that seem like dynamic host names
#3 looks for no PTR record at all

In all 3 cases, the [^\]]* makes sure you don't look past the first element of the list (so the data obtained from the first received header).

I'd probably assign a score of 4.5 to #1 and #2, and 6 to #3 (but that's because I want to be sure to flag them as spam, but not exceed a score of 10 if #1 and #2 are both true ... because I reject at a score >= 10; if you aren't worried about exceeding 10, then I might assign a score of 5 or 6 to all 3 rules ... keeping in mind that #3 wont happen in combination with #1 and #2, but #1 and #2 might happen together).


Right now, I don't use SA for this. I use mimedefang. And it rejects the message outright for this... but some people suggested I might look into merely quarantining these messages for those few legitimate businesses who are stuck on a bad ISP, and are too thick headed to use their ISP's mail server.


Reply via email to