-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 JD Smith wrote: > Greetings List: > > My name is JD Smith and I have been put in charge of setting up a spam > solution for my organization. I have chosen to go with MailScanner + > Postfix + SA + MailWatch. > > I have everything pretty much setup and it is working, however my spam > filtering is far from the 90th percentile.. I think I'm actually only > catching around 70% or something which is worse than our old solution. > > I trained the bayes with a corpus of common spam that was recommended to > me by someone somewhere (I forget) when I first got started. Maybe I > need new updated rules? Does anyone have any suggestions on where I > might find a list of good, suggested rules to implement? > > Best regards, > > JD Smith > > Training Bayes with common spam is not the best way. It should be learned with Spam that is specific for your mail-accounts (or better, on a per account basis).
SARE has some very good rules. The SpamAssassin Wiki should help you out further. Kind Regards, Sander Holthaus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEOnDiVf373DysOTURAgIFAJ47fscgLgPAWiCYHmQC3JkEHhMRgQCghOUU ow7Vf7Ho9UZytJt41kJOCRs= =iG6f -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
