Postfix and mailScanner work fine...
http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:mta:pos tfix:politics yes it doesn't use the 'accepted' interface but it works fine and many many people have implemented PF and MS together with no problems. -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 > -----Original Message----- > From: Sipos Gabor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 April 2006 10:40 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: SpamAssassin Woes > > > Hello, > > If you are using postfix, don't use mailscanner, it uses a > non-documented (and therefore not supported) access to the postfix > queue files. Use amavisd-new instead to integrate postfix and > spamassassin. > > Anyways, the default rules in spamassassin will NOT get you anything > much than 70% in caught spam - that's what bayes is for. Train it with > YOUR spam, not someone else's! > > > > Gabor Sipos > > > > Greetings List: > > > My name is JD Smith and I have been put in charge of setting up a spam > > solution for my organization. I have chosen to go with MailScanner + > > Postfix + SA + MailWatch. > > > I have everything pretty much setup and it is working, however my spam > > filtering is far from the 90th percentile.. I think I'm actually only > > catching around 70% or something which is worse than our old solution. > > > I trained the bayes with a corpus of common spam that was recommended to > > me by someone somewhere (I forget) when I first got started. Maybe I > > need new updated rules? Does anyone have any suggestions on where I > > might find a list of good, suggested rules to implement? > > > Best regards, > > > JD Smith > > > ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean. **********************************************************************
