Does amavisd-new happen to have a pre-built front-end similar to MailWatch? If not then it's no use to me as I don't have time to build one from scratch, especially not after the time I've already spent customizing MailWatch.
Best regards, JD Smith -----Original Message----- From: Sipos Gabor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 4:40 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: SpamAssassin Woes Hello, If you are using postfix, don't use mailscanner, it uses a non-documented (and therefore not supported) access to the postfix queue files. Use amavisd-new instead to integrate postfix and spamassassin. Anyways, the default rules in spamassassin will NOT get you anything much than 70% in caught spam - that's what bayes is for. Train it with YOUR spam, not someone else's! Gabor Sipos > Greetings List: > My name is JD Smith and I have been put in charge of setting up a spam > solution for my organization. I have chosen to go with MailScanner + > Postfix + SA + MailWatch. > I have everything pretty much setup and it is working, however my spam > filtering is far from the 90th percentile.. I think I'm actually only > catching around 70% or something which is worse than our old solution. > I trained the bayes with a corpus of common spam that was recommended to > me by someone somewhere (I forget) when I first got started. Maybe I > need new updated rules? Does anyone have any suggestions on where I > might find a list of good, suggested rules to implement? > Best regards, > JD Smith -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by ShooSpam, and is believed to be clean.
