Although I am not specifically familiar with MailWatch, there is Maia Mailguard which uses a customized version of amavisd-new 2.2.0. There is also MailZu but it only does quarantine management.

http://www.maiamailguard.com/
http://www.mailzu.org/


JD Smith wrote:
Does amavisd-new happen to have a pre-built front-end similar to
MailWatch?  If not then it's no use to me as I don't have time to build
one from scratch, especially not after the time I've already spent
customizing MailWatch.

Best regards,

JD Smith

-----Original Message-----
From: Sipos Gabor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 4:40 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin Woes


Hello,

If you are using postfix, don't use mailscanner, it uses a
non-documented (and therefore not supported) access to the postfix
queue files. Use amavisd-new instead to integrate postfix and
spamassassin.

Anyways, the default rules in spamassassin will NOT get you anything
much than 70% in caught spam - that's what bayes is for. Train it with
YOUR spam, not someone else's!



Gabor Sipos


Greetings List:

My name is JD Smith and I have been put in charge of setting up a spam
solution for my organization.  I have chosen to go with MailScanner +
Postfix + SA + MailWatch.

I have everything pretty much setup and it is working, however my spam
filtering is far from the 90th percentile..  I think I'm actually only
catching around 70% or something which is worse than our old solution.

I trained the bayes with a corpus of common spam that was recommended
to
me by someone somewhere (I forget) when I first got started.  Maybe I
need new updated rules?  Does anyone have any suggestions on where I
might find a list of good, suggested rules to implement?

Best regards,

JD Smith






Reply via email to