Hi!
And again, it's not the over-lap in-and-of-itself that's a problem. It's when the overlap matches nonspam that problems occur. I don't have any nonspam samples onhand with surbl overlap. Only surbl/uribl overlap.
We get reports allmost daily, most of them are only listed in one single list. So i dont share the feelings its a bad idea to overscore... I can safely say its rather rare we get a FP notification with lets say 3-4 seperate lists involved...
I don't think it's bad to overscore spam. I've never said that. I think it's REALLY bad to overscore rules which have potential to "group hit" nonspam.
Potentionally *ALL* hits and rules van hit nonspam. The question is, do they, or is it working just fine as it is now and are we having a discussion for just the fuzz?
Bye, Raymond.
