On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 10:50, dir dir <sikerasa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What problems can’t it solve? > > No flexible indices > No querying on non PK values > Not good for binary data (>64mb) unless you chunck > Row contents must fit in available memory > > Gary Dusbabek say: Row contents must fit in available memory. Honestly I do > not understand > the meaning from that statement. Thank you. > > Dir. >
The main reason is that the compaction operation (removing deleted values) currently requires that an entire row be read into memory. Gary Dusbabek
