Don't know what "list like that" you are referring to. Currently, Android (and 
maybe iOS, too, I don't know) requires Location as a prerequisite to using 
Bluetooth. My impression is that with the new API, this is not required. So, 
the list for any app is smaller.

I believe currently COVID watch only needs Bluetooth, Location (because of 
Bluetooth), notifications (but I'm hoping that can be made optional) and 
Internet. I haven't looked at the akp, uh, apk uh, whatever it is. 

A concern that I have is that what was open source and peer reviewed is now 
pushed down into the API. And will that API be available on all Android 5.0 up? 
iOS 11 up?

COVID Watch is not stopping to see how this plays out. The team is testing this 
weekend. The same with DP3T. So, maybe we don't need no API improvements. Maybe.

I hope an app by one of the teams concerned about privacy will beat "to market" 
any government app. I would be very upset of Big Brother mandated the use of 
COVID Watch. I knew a fellow who worked hard for liberty in Cuba only to have 
the work stolen by Castro in a power grab. 

Maybe this is where you can contribute, Mark. You can help protect us.

Maybe you can come up with some ways to test apps and APIs.
Maybe you can come up with methods to help with contact tracing that don't rely 
on a long list of permissions.

Of course, the 4Catalyst project is pretty cool, too.

> On Apr 10, 2020, at 4:06 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode 
> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
> On 4/10/20 11:56 AM, Mike Doub via use-livecode wrote:
>> Apple and Google adding contact tracking to their OSs
>> https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/10/business/stock-market-today-coronavirus.html#link-418ae121
> 
> From my limited understanding of this, Apple and Google are creating an API 
> which will be part of the OS. And then it's up to developers to create apps 
> and convince users to download them (Apple gets their 30% off the top, no?). 
> So at best we have reporting from the set of users who have decided to opt 
> in, download an app, and accept the app's permissions.
> 
> I can just imagine what that permissions list will look like. And if I ever 
> see a list like that on an app I'm about to install, it goes straight in the 
> trash. This sounds like a long shot.
> 
> Of course, a "standard" app will soon become compulsory for tracking and 
> permission to be out on the street, as it did in China.
> 
> https://twitter.com/ashk4n?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1248659874679902210
> 
> -- 
> Mark Wieder
> ahsoftw...@gmail.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to