If that trend holds there will be a total of almost 80,000,000. Obviously it will have ups and downs, but even half that average would reach the goal. Will re-investigate GSM's signal strength in my area, as well as data plans.
Josh Leverette <coder...@gmail.com> wrote: >The only number I'm writing down is the total funding amount so far at >each >interval, I'm not writing anything down about individual users. I feel >like >anything more than just looking at the total would be kind of sketchy. >I >ran some analysis and out of all of the 90 second periods, the most >amount >of contribution that the project received was $18,432 total during one >90 >second interval. The average so far has been about $2,607 per 90 second >interval. > > >On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Omar B. <estela...@hotmail.com> >wrote: > >> Nice, thx for recording the data and the graph. >> >> did you get any data on individuals who may had purchased multiple >times >> consecutively? , how many each individual got ? >> >> I Think indiegogo only lets you select one perk even if you add more >cash >> to the amount. >> >> So it wouldn't be a surprise if some made multiple purchases >consecutively. >> >> Anyway this will be a crucial week, hope their double edge and other >perks >> get mass acceptance. >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: coder...@gmail.com >> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:41:00 -0500 >> >> Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Ubuntu Edge (the Ubuntu handset) >> To: estela...@hotmail.com >> CC: ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net >> >> >> Actually, this will probably help. This is the amount of funding the >> project had received over time. The data was sampled at a rate of >once >> every 90 seconds. You can clearly see the moment when the $600 phone >option >> ran out. Calculating the trend line for the second half of the graph >> indicates that the campaign will raise about $20,000,000 total over >the >> full period of the campaign, which is not enough. I believe that this >is >> the reason Canonical introduced the Double Edge option a few minutes >ago, >> which might boost sales by a little bit more. Hopefully this >clarifies my >> point. There lines are very smooth. If a company bought 100 units all >at >> once, there would be a visible blip on the graph, in my opinion. That >would >> be $60,000 in pledges all at once, which would break the monotony of >the >> graph. >> >> [image: Inline image 1] >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Josh Leverette ><coder...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> I'm not saying companies *couldn't* buy from the indiegogo deal. I'm >just >> saying the companies with the money to buy from this fundraiser >wouldn't be >> able to move fast enough to have gotten in on the 1st day of sales. >> Companies move slowly for the most part, and I was watching the sales >> figures carefully. I've even plotted them on a graph over time as the >data >> has come in, starting at about $1.5million dollars in sales. I >should've >> started the data collection earlier, but I stupidly didn't think to. >I >> watched the number from the start though, even though they weren't >being >> recorded. The rates were constant. There was no bulk purchase done by >any >> one company. If you would like to review my numbers, I can send you >the >> spreadsheet. >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Omar B. <estela...@hotmail.com> >wrote: >> >> >Stores and resellers were not purchasing from indiegogo yesterday. >There >> might have been one or two, but that's simply not what happened. This >whole >> campaign is all about individuals buying these phones. I don't want >to see >> this campaign fail anymore than you do. People will either buy them >at >> $830, or they won't. >> >> >> yes... sure. >> >> I didn't see anywhere that said limited one per client. >> >> Or that you shouldn't get involved with business reasons in mind and >get a >> bunch of them. >> >> There's nothing to lose at the moment, which makes it even better. In >> fact anyone can come in and buy most of the 35k remaining, I don't >think >> its prohibited. >> >> I believe even companies got into the discounted 600 tier and took >their >> share and is why you see 0 in the enterprise tier. Why would you as a >> company pay 80/160k when you can pay 60/120k right there (Big >discount in >> one go), is a no brainer, they wouldn't survive as companies by being >dumb >> about $, specially on this economy. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone >> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sincerely, >> Josh >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sincerely, >> Josh >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone >> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > > >-- >Sincerely, > Josh > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >-- >Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone >Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net >Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone >More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
