On 02/01/2012 10:00 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 06:30:04 Stefano Babic wrote:
On 31/01/2012 20:14, Eric Nelson wrote:
On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote:
Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and
chip-select

to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command:
        U-Boot>   sf probe

instead of the more cumbersome usage when a GPIO is tacked onto
the chip-select. Otherwise, this command-line would be needed

to specify GP3:19 on SabreLite:
        U-Boot>   sf probe 0x5300

Patch 2 provides a description of usage and configuration of
CONFIG_CMD_SF.

you can drop these two SF patches from your mx6q series.  i don't want
to keep
checking to see if you've updated them :p.

I figured as much, but I can't really test them without the rest of the
series...

It does not matter - Mike, what do you think if I merge the whole
patchset into u-boot-imx ? Else the mx6qsabrelite board cannot be built
until all patches will be merged by Wolfgang.

i don't see why this series depends on the two spi flash patches.  they were
both "nice to have" patches which only change the default `sf` behavior.  the
boards will compile&  run perfectly fine without them.
-mike

Hi Mike,

My comment was the inverse: I can't test just the 'sf probe' updates unless I
have the core SPI flash support for mx6qsabrelite.

AFAIK, the update to cmd_sf doesn't have any dependencies and of course the README update doesn't.

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to