On Wednesday 01 February 2012 06:30:04 Stefano Babic wrote: > On 31/01/2012 20:14, Eric Nelson wrote: > > On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote: > >>> Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and > >>> chip-select > >>> > >>> to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command: > >>> U-Boot> sf probe > >>> > >>> instead of the more cumbersome usage when a GPIO is tacked onto > >>> the chip-select. Otherwise, this command-line would be needed > >>> > >>> to specify GP3:19 on SabreLite: > >>> U-Boot> sf probe 0x5300 > >>> > >>> Patch 2 provides a description of usage and configuration of > >>> CONFIG_CMD_SF. > >> > >> you can drop these two SF patches from your mx6q series. i don't want > >> to keep > >> checking to see if you've updated them :p. > > > > I figured as much, but I can't really test them without the rest of the > > series... > > It does not matter - Mike, what do you think if I merge the whole > patchset into u-boot-imx ? Else the mx6qsabrelite board cannot be built > until all patches will be merged by Wolfgang.
i don't see why this series depends on the two spi flash patches. they were both "nice to have" patches which only change the default `sf` behavior. the boards will compile & run perfectly fine without them. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
