Hi Albert, On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:21:18 +0200 Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> wrote:
> Hi Lukasz, > > On 12/08/2011 13:41, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > It is embarrassing to admit, but I've __wrongly__ assumed that > > *_range() functions are accepting the start address and range for > > invalidation/flushing. > > Do you mean we're hitting again a confusion between *_range(start, > stop) and *_range(start, length)? > > If so, then the need to get rid of 'anonymous prototypes' becomes > greater yet. > > Amicalement, Yes, it seems so. Maybe it is a matter of my programming habits. Anyway I should check semantics, before I started hacking. -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung Poland R&D Center Platform Group _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
