Dear *ALL*, >> It is embarrassing to admit, but I've __wrongly__ assumed that *_range() >> functions are accepting the start address and range for >> invalidation/flushing. > > Do you mean we're hitting again a confusion between *_range(start, stop) > and *_range(start, length)? > > If so, then the need to get rid of 'anonymous prototypes' becomes > greater yet.
Maybe the parameters should even be of type (void *start, void *beyond_end) ? We are talking of addresses here anyway. Most likely the calling place has it as pointer, and inside the function it might have to be casted. Reinhard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
