Hi Lukasz, On 12/08/2011 13:41, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> It is embarrassing to admit, but I've __wrongly__ assumed that *_range() > functions are accepting the start address and range for > invalidation/flushing. Do you mean we're hitting again a confusion between *_range(start, stop) and *_range(start, length)? If so, then the need to get rid of 'anonymous prototypes' becomes greater yet. Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
