On 6/26/19 1:25 PM, Melin Tomas wrote: > On 6/26/19 1:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> On 6/26/19 12:39 PM, Melin Tomas wrote: >> >>> As such, it's probably a good idea to keep the same delay values here as >>> in the original driver unless good reason to use something else. >>> >>> As what goes for the original reasoning for 3ms, the commit history does >>> not mention that so I cannot comment. >> So would you be so kind and research this ? > > Based on a short study of other i2c bus drivers it seems most have bus > busy timeout checks. > > The timeout values seems to differ, ranging from milliseconds to seconds.
Yep > So probably it's just a number, after all it's just a check to know if > we are good to go. And is the number large enough ? -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
