On 6/26/19 1:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 6/26/19 12:39 PM, Melin Tomas wrote: > >> As such, it's probably a good idea to keep the same delay values here as >> in the original driver unless good reason to use something else. >> >> As what goes for the original reasoning for 3ms, the commit history does >> not mention that so I cannot comment. > So would you be so kind and research this ?
Based on a short study of other i2c bus drivers it seems most have bus busy timeout checks. The timeout values seems to differ, ranging from milliseconds to seconds. So probably it's just a number, after all it's just a check to know if we are good to go. thanks, Tomas _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
