> What's the situation with other groups for TLS 1.3? > Specifically, are there any plans to specify SecP384r1MLKEM1024?
This draft was a merger of two drafts because one of the TLS Registry experts asked if they could do so. I agree that P384 is probably of interest to many people, and it would be cleanest to add it into the draft, assuming the mechanism is very similar to P256. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
