IMHO, get the TLS-1.3 standard out first, then start mucking with it. There's nothing yet to make "visibility" into. ;-)
And in any case I'm against weakening the protocol, since there are other ways to accomplish the perlustrator's mission. Regards, Uri Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 22, 2017, at 13:54, Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> wrote: > > Tony: >> >> Can you provide a *specific citation* as to where you will be *required* to >> use TLS 1.3 any time in, say, the next decade? >> > No one is requiring TLS 1.3 that I know about. However, there are places > that require visibility into TLS. I will let one of the people that works in > a regulated industry offer pointers to the documents. > > Russ > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
