I have.
I was only asking what your opinion was, based on that statement in your reply.

From: Ted Lemon [mailto:mel...@fugue.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 7:44 PM
To: Ackermann, Michael <mackerm...@bcbsm.com>
Cc: Steve Fenter <steven.fente...@gmail.com>; tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00

On Oct 22, 2017, at 7:16 PM, Ackermann, Michael 
<mackerm...@bcbsm.com<mailto:mackerm...@bcbsm.com>> wrote:
And out of curiosity,  what is the simpler protocol you are recommending?    I 
say out of curiosity because switching to a whole different protocol is not 
likely to be feasible from any perspective for large enterprises and the 
complex, multi-tier protocols that are prevalent.

Perhaps you should read the article that Kathleen shared earlier today?



The information contained in this communication is highly confidential and is 
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom this communication is 
directed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is 
prohibited. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any 
unintended receipt and delete the original message without making any copies.
 
 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan are 
nonprofit corporations and independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue 
Shield Association.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to