I am merely trying to understand if there are any constructive suggestions amongst all these discussions, that we should consider.
Your comment was "It would be better to use a simpler protocol," My question back to you was WHAT SIMPLIER PROTOCOL? If your answer to my question, is to refer to Kathleen's document, then she discusses a few things. If I have to guess which one of those you may be referring to, I will guess IPSEC? Is this correct? Are you suggesting we should convert to IPSEC? If that was stated in any previous correspondence, I did not see it. From: Ted Lemon [mailto:mel...@fugue.com] Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 11:41 AM To: Ackermann, Michael <mackerm...@bcbsm.com> Cc: Steve Fenter <steven.fente...@gmail.com>; tls@ietf.org Subject: Re: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00 On Oct 23, 2017, at 10:35 AM, Ackermann, Michael <mackerm...@bcbsm.com<mailto:mackerm...@bcbsm.com>> wrote: I was only asking what your opinion was, based on that statement in your reply. With respect, Michael, I gave my opinion in the message to which Kathleen replied, so your assertion that you have been reading these messages doesn't seem to be reflected in the dialog we are having. The information contained in this communication is highly confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom this communication is directed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended receipt and delete the original message without making any copies. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan are nonprofit corporations and independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
