So it sounds like we are in agreement that continuing to use TLS 1.2 is not a viable long term alternative.
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie] Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 12:14 PM To: Ackermann, Michael <mackerm...@bcbsm.com>; Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com>; Darin Pettis <dpp.e...@gmail.com>; tls@ietf.org Subject: Re: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00 On 20/10/17 17:00, Ackermann, Michael wrote: > Expressly reacting to the viability of continuing to use TLS1.2 forever. Sorry, that's just misquoting. Rich asked "why do the WG need to debate this now" Darin said "we must, because we need snooping..." I said "no, you can use TLS1.2 and debate this after TLS1.3 is done." That is nothing like saying "use TLS1.2 forever." Please don't misquote like that. S The information contained in this communication is highly confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom this communication is directed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended receipt and delete the original message without making any copies. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan are nonprofit corporations and independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
