I agree with Christian and Ben's points. I'd also add: On 19/10/17 23:30, Darin Pettis wrote: > The question has been raised: "Why address visibility now?" The answer is > that it is critical that the visibility capability is retained. It is > available today through the RSA key exchange algorithm.
That yet again ignores the fact that TLS1.2 will continue to be available, which utterly undermines your argument that we need to disrupt the work on TLS1.3 with this divisive debate S
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
