Minor clarification... On 20/10/17 14:44, Salz, Rich wrote: > Some members of the WG rose up and wanted explicit opt-in
I don't think "wanted" is quite right. Some WG participants (e.g. me) wanted nothing like this to ever be done in the IETF. Others did comment that the lack of client opt-in was a bad aspect of draft-green, but I'm not sure that anyone clearly said "I do want draft-green snooping, but with client opt-in." S.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
