I know what you guys are saying ... and that's exactly what happends when HR and management people are not in touch with technology . Then we get people running to .net because they've read in a business magasine owned by MS that .net is suppoerior in all aspects : )
On 12/8/05, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's unfortunate that hiring practices work that way sometimes. I don't > think we've ever hired a developer based solely on the technologies they > use and are familiar with, but mostly on our quick and dirty "just how > intelligent and geeky are you"? blitzkrieg of technical questions ;) > > Isn't google hiring tapestry developers now? We'll see. > > On 12/8/05, Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't think it offends me, at least. But OS projects have to get > > *merit* to override "corporate standards" and that's what a lot of OS > > developers fail to see. Last time I check Struts wasn't an official > > standard, and Tapestry could go the same path, if it sticks with > > corporate values such as stability, marketing, support, etc ;). > > > > All open source, of course. > > > > -- > > Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi > > DTQ Software > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
