talk  

Messages by Thread

• • [OSM-talk] Fédé des pros d'OSM, la fausse bonne idée / OSM pros' federation, the wrong, good idea severin.menard via talk
• [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) facebook_140f8d4e-9d8f-4d51-a5a7-320f53afc591
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) facebook_140f8d4e-9d8f-4d51-a5a7-320f53afc591
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) David Haberthür
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!) Marc_marc
• [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) facebook_140f8d4e-9d8f-4d51-a5a7-320f53afc591
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) Sören Reinecke
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) facebook_140f8d4e-9d8f-4d51-a5a7-320f53afc591
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) Cj Malone
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) john whelan
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) facebook_140f8d4e-9d8f-4d51-a5a7-320f53afc591
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) Sören Reinecke
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) Sören Reinecke
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Edit - Bus stops status link & Bus lines timetable link (Tenerife) facebook_140f8d4e-9d8f-4d51-a5a7-320f53afc591
• [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #660 2023-03-07-2023-03-13 weeklyteam
• [OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar Mateusz Konieczny via talk
• [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #659 2023-02-28-2023-03-06 weeklyteam
• [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings John Whelan
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Isaac Boates
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings john whelan
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Frederik Ramm
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Warin
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings john whelan
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Pierre Béland via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Pierre Béland via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Pierre Béland via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Pierre Béland via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Pierre Béland via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Harrison Scofield
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Harrison Scofield
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate Buildings Marc_marc
• [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #658 2023-02-21-2023-02-27 weeklyteam
• [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #657 2023-02-14-2023-02-20 weeklyteam
• [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Andy Mabbett
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Dave F via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Warin
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Warin
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Warin
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Philip Barnes
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!) Warin
• [OSM-talk] Test Import of forum.osm.org to community.osm.org Grant Slater
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Test Import of forum.osm.org to community.osm.org Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Test Import of forum.osm.org to community.osm.org Grant Slater
• [OSM-talk] outaage 18/02 umap.openstreetmap.fr Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] outaage 18/02 umap.openstreetmap.fr Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] outaage 18/02 umap.openstreetmap.fr Spike
• [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #656 2023-02-07-2023-02-13 weeklyteam
• [OSM-talk] "Stadium" map roulette challenge causing issues Andy Mabbett
  • Re: [OSM-talk] "Stadium" map roulette challenge causing issues Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] "Stadium" map roulette challenge causing issues David Haberthür
• [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #655 2023-01-31-2023-02-06 weeklyteam
• [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Brian M. Sperlongano
  • Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning john whelan
  • Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Zeke Farwell
  • Re: [OSM-talk] [automated edit] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] [automated edit] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning john whelan
  • Re: [OSM-talk] [automated edit] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] [automated edit] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] [automated edit] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning stevea
  • Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Tobias Knerr
  • Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning Warin
• Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-ie] Mapping of footpaths and cycleways Dave Foley
• [OSM-talk] Announcement: OpenAirportMap Daniel Korn
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Announcement: OpenAirportMap Stephan Knauss
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Announcement: OpenAirportMap Paul Norman
• [OSM-talk] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base rob potter
  • Re: [OSM-talk] [talk-au] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Andrew Harvey
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base john whelan
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Greg Troxel
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Andrew Harvey
  • Re: [OSM-talk] [talk-au] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Andrew Davidson
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Greg Troxel
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Mike Thompson
  • Re: [OSM-talk] [talk-au] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base forster
  • Re: [OSM-talk] [talk-au] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base stevea
  • Re: [OSM-talk] [talk-au] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base Andrew Davidson
• [OSM-talk] consultation on list moderation Mikel Maron
• [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #654 2023-01-24-2023-01-30 weeklyteam
• [OSM-talk] Dubious websites added to tourist attractions? Dave F via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Dubious websites added to tourist attractions? Brian M. Sperlongano
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Dubious websites added to tourist attractions? Andy Townsend
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Dubious websites added to tourist attractions? Niels Elgaard Larsen
• [OSM-talk] AT&T Email Mike N.
  • Re: [OSM-talk] AT&T Email Tom Hughes via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] AT&T Email Grant Slater
  • Re: [OSM-talk] AT&T Email Mike N.
• [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #653 2023-01-17-2023-01-23 weeklyteam
• [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #652 2023-01-10-2023-01-16 weeklyteam
• [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? john whelan
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? stevea
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? john whelan
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? stevea
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Brian M. Sperlongano
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Dave F via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Paul Johnson
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Clifford Snow
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? John Whelan
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Pierre Béland via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Warin
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Ilya Zverev
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Niels Elgaard Larsen
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Jóhannes Birgir Jensson
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Nick Whitelegg via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? john whelan
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Nick Whitelegg via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? john whelan
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Jeremy Harris
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Adam Franco
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Russ Garrett
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Dave F via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? MoiraPrime via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines? Allan Mustard
• [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #651 2023-01-03-2023-01-09 weeklyteam
• [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Carto release v5.7.0 Paul Norman
• [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #650 2022-12-27-2023-01-02 weeklyteam
• [OSM-talk] Public Rights of Way overlay missing Ranasinghe, Jas via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Public Rights of Way overlay missing Richard Fairhurst
• [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Sören Reinecke
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Frederik Ramm
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' stevea
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Greg Troxel
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Andy Townsend
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Frederik Ramm
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' stevea
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Shawn K. Quinn
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Simon Poole
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Minh Nguyen
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Marc_marc
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Sören Reinecke
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Frederik Ramm
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Sören Reinecke
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Yves via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Greg Troxel
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Niels Elgaard Larsen
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Yves via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Snusmumriken
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Andy Townsend
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Snusmumriken
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Yves via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Snusmumriken
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Greg Troxel
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Snusmumriken
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Ed Loach
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Snusmumriken
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Mateusz Konieczny via talk
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Niels Elgaard Larsen
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid' Andy Mabbett
• [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #649 2022-12-20-2022-12-26 weeklyteam
• [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to increment or decrement house numbers Andy Mabbett

• Earlier messages
• Later messages