Feb 25, 2023, 22:00 by [email protected]: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 25 Feb 2023, at 20:13, Mateusz Konieczny via talk >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> There is no point in manual drudgery here, with values clearly >> replaceable by better matches. >> >> This values here do NOT require manual overview. If this cases will >> turn out to be an useful signal of invalid editing than I will remain >> reviewing nearby areas where bot edited. >> > > > forgot to say I applaud to this initiative, thank you for tackling this and > documenting the process. I agree that there are many cases that can be fixed > automatically, and your list shows good examples, but of course we must be > very careful to not iron everything flat when there might be subtle > differences. This is why it is important to have many eyes on such bot edits > and document the details. > BTW, if someone would prepare similar list for some key (replacements of value A by value B within the same key, without any additional checks/replacements/conditions, with explanations why such replacements are obviously useful), AND they confirmed that this tags are not very good at indicating places where intensive cleanup/reverts are needed AND list would be in general reasonably reviewed AND publish bot proposal on this mailing list, like this one then I can run such edit. Preparing it is time-consuming, running bot itself is easy. (lets say that offer is active for the next 30 days so noone will try this in say 6 years from now, may be revoked earlier if people will try to post really badly prepared lists)
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
