Marc, I will revise and share data. First, below are the instructions to extract relations metadata with
[out:csv(::changeset, ::timestamp,::user, ::type, ::id, building, highway, level, layer, 'building:part', 'building:roof')]; relation(id: 3240506, 3240507, 3240508, 3240509, 3240510, 3240511, 3240512, 3240513, 3240514, 3240515, 3240516, 3240517, 8325855, 8325856, 8325857, 8325858, 8853592, 8898812, 8898813, 8898814, 9168214, 9168215, 9168216, 9168217, 9168218, 9168219, 9173897, 9173898, 9173899, 9173900, 9173901, 9173902, 9173903, 9173904, 9173905, 9175052, 9175053, 9175054, 9175055, 9796369, 9796370, 9796371, 9796372, 10326411, 10326412, 10326413, 10326414, 10784846, 10784847, 10784848, 10784849, 11305092, 11305093, 11305094, 11305095, 13965409, 13965410, 13965411, 13965412, 14627860, 14627861, 14627862, 14627863, 15538063, 15538064, 15538065 ); out meta; Overpass. We can spot other relations with the level attribute. Pierre ------- Original Message ------- Le mardi 14 mars 2023 à 11:51, Marc_marc <[email protected]> a écrit : > Le 14.03.23 à 13:45, Pierre Béland via talk a écrit : > > > I imported the osm metadata using overpass > > > can youu share it to avoid having to make it again :) > > > Simple Building duplicates from the same contributor are the easy ones to > > correct. > > > yes, on the condition that you can easily detect when the contributor > wanted to represent a simple building ? > I imagine that a first criterion could be the absence of the level layer > tag (which we see badly used in one of your examples) and perhaps > building:level > > > osm type nb of quaddup objects > > way 1 838 3352 > > > maybe best to focus on that first > > > See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13965412 that contains > > way/677238859 with inner role to 6 relations that represent each level of > > the building. > > > commented https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118924402 > > > one building is represented with one way (6 nodes) and 3 relations in which > > this way has role=outer. > > way 1137657546 building=cabin > > Relation : 15538065 building=yes > > Relation : 15538064 building=yes > > Relation : Horsnæs Fangststation (15538063) place=locality > > > ccommented https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133075628 > > > These are four different relations. > > -10326414 -10326413 -10326412 -10326411 > > They all share these 2 buildings as outer members. > > 48002128 505561207 > > > what's strange is to have managed to do this with iD > but that's three mistakes : > - duplicate > - the garage is not a house > - the address in Switzerland represents an entrance door and by > extention the building if this one has only one address. if the no. 7 > represents the house, the garage does have the no. 7 (but probably the > number 7.1 which is rarely tagged in osm) > > Regards, > Marc > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
