Il giorno mar 8 ott 2024 alle ore 08:54 Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> "Dato che il numero civico contraddistingue un accesso esterno che immette > alle unità immobiliari, *le informazioni sugli indirizzi possono essere > aggiunte solo come semplice nodo in corrispondenza dell'accesso esterno o, > in alternativa, a un nodo di ingresso di un edificio o sito. NON bisogna > aggiungere le informazioni di indirizzo a edifici, siti o altre tipologie > di aree.*" > > this is just plain wrong and should be fixed. It tries to be prescriptive > but does not reflect the actual mapping practice, and does not lead to > better data because it discourages adding address information to POIs and > ignores the fact that POIs do have addresses in the real world. > > This is indeed good, as it states that in Italy you should not put a housenumber as a tag on a building way for example. I'd like to see, as anyone of us, a better map, and if this is achieved through multiple refining steps... well, I'm ok with that. It's part of the nature of the mapping process and we cannot pretend that an import such this could satisfy the precision we achieve by putting by hand every single node. If this would have been easy, the map should appear now filled with housenumbers information, but it's not. An import is a good, even if not perfect, substitute of missing human resources like local mappers. In my opinion Premislav is doing a great job and I support his efforts. I believe that he answered all the questions, so in my opinion we should proceed.
_______________________________________________ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
