On Oct 8, 2022, at 11:44 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 16:36, stevea <stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote:
> 
> > Disagree, some are are the same feature .. taps can be drinking water .. or 
> > 'not suitable for drinking' (legal CYA?), 'recommend you boil' (more CYA?), 
> > and 'not suitable for drinking' (you really would not drink this stuff, 
> > just look and smell it!)
> 
> Yes, taps CAN be drinking water, but not necessarily are. 
> 
> Don't know if it's an Oz-only thing, but we have some taps (both in parks & 
> some private properties) that are coloured purple to show that they are 
> connected to a separate recycled water grid, so the water should NOT be drunk.
> 
> https://www.westernportwater.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Recycled-Water2.jpg

Yes, Graeme, in California (USA) we have exactly these (such as my golf course 
example).  While there is no "purple means don't drink" color-coding here, 
there seems to be a state law (or something just as firm) that if a 
publicly-accessible "water tap" dispenses water which is NOT safe to drink (and 
again, these are no particular color), there MUST be a sign that says 
"non-potable" or "do not drink" or "using reclaimed water" or has the 
"international red circle-with-a-slash-means no and a picture of a human 
drinking water" icon...or ALL of the above.

We do seem to be getting closer to harmony here, but there are still a few 
sharps and flats among the notes we're all humming.  Good.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to