sent from a phone
> On 8 Oct 2022, at 12:43, Enno Hermann <enno.herm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > One thing I keep wondering about on this topic is how to tag very simple > fountains that are widespread in Switzerland along hiking paths > (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Adlisberg_-_Gockhausen_IMG_4215.jpg) > or in villages > (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brunnen1886BassersdorfI.jpg). > Apparently they are not decorative enough for some people and should be > tagged amenity=drinking_water. However, the same type of fountain could have > a sign saying the water is not potable > (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brunnen_Waldweg.jpeg, > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2014-05-20-Yverdon_(Foto_Dietrich_Michael_Weidmann)_032.JPG); yes, if the water is drinkable, I would go with amenity=drinking_water, if it isn’t, maybe watering_place with drinking_water=no? Or if animals can’t drink it either, amenity=fountain seems ok. In general I believe we should have a property like trough=yes for situations where the water is collected in a trough and accessible to animals. Feel free to make up a generic fountain tag for this kind of fountain. If the water comes from a spring in loco, natural=spring should also be added Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
