It seems the discussion about this proposal is only starting now.
This is unfortunate. It should have happened earlier and might cause
frustration with the proposal author. Really sorry for that -- this is
not ideal.
But still better to fix some major issues to improve the proposal than
approving it in a sub-perfect state.
On 07/10/2022 12:27, Marc_marc wrote:
Hello,
Le 07.10.22 à 12:11, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
who cares for "in use" or "approved"
me :)
approved that means that the subject has been discussed,
that people have spent time on it, that there has been
an opportunity to detect problems, to propose improvements
it's quite different from an "in use", because a guy invented
a new tag, then another one received the proposal by autocompletion
in iD and in the end we have many cases of a poorly named tag (I think
of the suffix _type which doesn't mean anything) or poorly defined
or poorly integrated with other tags (just see the saga of fountains
or forest)
Regards,
Marc
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
