I've briefly screened the wiki for voting and couldn't find anything on
that matter.
I'll revert my vote, sorry.
Anne, as commented in my original vote, I really appreciate your work on
this. But let's try to get this done in the proper order to avoid future
conflicts.
By the way: I've raised the exact same concern in the Citadel Proposal,
but only the proposal author seemed to notice:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Citadel
On 07/10/2022 11:06, stevea wrote:
On Oct 7, 2022, at 1:47 AM, Nathan Case <nathanc...@outlook.com> wrote:
If it's not appropriate then we end up in the situation where parent keys
aren't approved but child keys/values are - which seems a little odd.
This is a remarkably astute observation (thanks, Nathan!) and raises darn good
questions. I agree it is odd and I wouldn’t like to see this become a trend.
Anne, I don’t think you meant to “back-door” such “lesser status” tags into
OSM, I don’t attribute any nefariousness on your part, as these are
somewhat-subtle (yet still important) issues.
martianfreeloader, while I’ve never done it and it would be unusual, I believe
we are allowed to change our vote right up until the “closing of voting”
period. I wouldn’t encourage this behavior, as it can be seen as manipulative,
but an “honest overlook” like you’ve outlined here seems OK to me. If other or
some rule somewhere I’ve missed / am unaware of contradicts me, I’ll happily
make it MY turn to redact my “seems OK to me.” (I believe I have seen votes go
from approve / oppose to abstain, but I’d have to check, and it’s still pretty
rare).
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
