In this case you can simply use "parking:lane:right = parallel". Since it is a simple parking lane, it has nothing to do with street_side as suggested in the proposal.
(The question is rather how to tag the bike lane - a suggestion is for example is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/cycleway:protection) Am 27.10.20 um 05:09 schrieb Phake Nick: > See "Parking-Protected Bike Lanes | The City of Portland, Oregon": > https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/77882 > > 在 2020年10月27日週二 01:45，Supaplex <supap...@riseup.net> 寫道： > >> Do you have an example picture/mapillary or similar of such a street? You >> call this case yourself "parking lane" and the way you describe it, it >> sounds like a typical case for parking:lane:* = >> parallel/diagonal/perpendicular, but not for >> parking:lane:*/parking=street_side. "street_side" is intended for cases >> where the parking spaces are structurally (especially structured by curbs) >> located on one side of the carriageway. (That means, if - hypothetically - >> no vehicles were parked there, you could still not drive there because curb >> extensions or street furniture would block a continuous drive.) >> >> A cycleway located behind this parking area is no longer part of the >> roadway and would therefore not be "lane" but "track". But maybe I >> misinterpreted the case you meant? >> >> >> Am 26.10.20 um 15:49 schrieb Paul Johnson: >> >> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 6:40 AM Supaplex <supap...@riseup.net> >> <supap...@riseup.net> wrote: >> >> >> Hey all, >> >> I would like to invite you to discuss a proposal for "parking = >> street_side" for areas suitable or designated for parking, which are >> directly adjacent to the carriageway of a road and can be reached directly >> from the roadway without having to use an access >> way:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/parking%3Dstreet_side >> >> The proposed tagging can be used on separate parking areas as well as with >> the parking:lane-scheme. It aims not only to differentiate such >> street-accompanying parking areas from others, especially >> "parking=surface", but also addresses a contradiction in the current use of >> the amenity=parking and parking:lane-scheme, which I would like to mention >> briefly at this point: the use of "layby"/"lay_by". >> >> The value "layby" was originally intended for forms of resting places, as >> they seem to be especially common in rural areas of Great Britain, Ireland >> or the US: short-stop rest-areas along through-traffic roads intended for >> breaks during a car-trip (see Wikipedia for a >> definition:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rest_area#Lay-bys). On areas with >> "amenity=parking" this key is also used in this sense (and mostly in Great >> Britain). >> >> Within the parking:lane-schema, however, the value "lay_by" (written with >> an underscore) has gained acceptance. According to the Wiki, this value is >> defined identically to the layby's mentioned above. Its actual use, >> however, differs from this and includes mainly street-side parking, as we >> address them in our proposal. >> >> >> How does this work out when the parking lane is not the curb lane? This >> arrangement is increasingly common in North America, where the parking >> isn't at the side of the road, one or more bicycle lanes are. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing >> listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
