I like the idea of using "buffered".
"doorzone" to me, is a pretty laoded and subjective.
Maybe something like:
cycleway:right=lane
cycleway:right:lane=exclusive
(cycleway:right:buffered=right/left/both/no)
cycleway:right:buffered:right=yes/no/0.3(m)
Yours
Hubert87
Am 03.05.2020 um 10:55 schrieb Jan Michel:
Hi,
I oppose adding this officially to the top-level cycleway:lane tag.
I see this information as one more property of the cycleway, like
surface, smoothness, width and so on.
We already have a documented key 'cycleway:buffer' that is described
as the width of the buffer space between car lanes and the bicycle lane.
The 'cycleway:buffer' tag is also used combined with :left and :right
to denote the buffer on left-hand and right-hand side of the cycleway.
Mappers in Berlin worked on a more detailed tagging of buffer and
protection of bicycle lanes, see (unfortunately in German only)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Verkehrswende/Radwege
I'd suggest to get in contact with them and discuss this. I imagine that
this information could fit very well into the cycleway:buffer tag - A
door zone is a non-existent buffer, so instead of 'no' one could use
'doorzone' as one of the non-numeric values.
Jan
On 03.05.20 08:37, Andrew Harvey wrote:
For a while myself and others have been using cycleway:lane=doorzone
to say the bicycle lane is in a doorzone, I've now added
documentation of this as "in use" at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:lane. However this
conflicts with the other "in use" cycleway:lane=exclusive/advisory,
since you can have exclusive/advisory lanes which are doorzone or not.
None of these have gone through a proposal process and both are
independently in use.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
