Maybe I missed something on this long thread but I don't understand why
we need to divide large refugee site from small refugee site. Why create
ambiguities if all of them are refugee sites?
Do we divide big schools from small schools? Or small theatres from big
theatres?
Why don't we just create the amenity=refugee_site tag and populate it
with basic keys like name, operator, population, etc. and then map
whatever exists inside that area, be it buildings, social facilities,
etc. There are refugee_sites which are de facto towns and villages, so
those would be mapped as a normal place.
Às 16:29 de 16/04/2020, Manon Viou escreveu:
Hello,
According to Martin and Warin, the difference between large and small
refugee site is not clear enough,
Martin suggested to use population capacity, for instance less than
200 people fro small refugee site,
Warin suggested to use number of square meters,
For what I have observed, small facilities sheltering refugee (for
instance: refugee centers, accommodation center, care and hosting
center, church) are not exactly what we can call refugee site. the
difference, beyond the number of building, number of population or
square meter, is quite obvious. Is it really necessary to set a
precise rule ? I would rather suggest to share some example (like the
ones mentioned above) in order to help contributors to decide if it
rather an amenity=refugee_site or a social_facility=shelter.
Regards,
Manon
Le 16 avril 2020 à 02:16, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit :
On 16/4/20 1:23 am, Manon Viou wrote:
Thanks Martin, yes, refugee sites should always be temporary even
if, as you said, some turn to be very long term places. That's why
we do not suggest to add temporary/permanent options.
Manon
In which case the description for amenity=social_facility +
social_facility=shelter is not correct.
If it is to be done on area then specify the number of square meters
rather than the number of buildings???
Buildings can be a of different sizes and capacities. An area could
be more consistent as to the number of people.
Imagery may not be up to date so counting buildings may not be possible.
Le 15 avril 2020 à 11:36, Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com <mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
sent from a phone
On 15. Apr 2020, at 01:13, Warin < 61sundow...@gmail.com
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I would think amenity=refugee_site is an area set aside for the
non-temporary residential use of refugees
maybe I’m a dreamer, but I would expect all refugee related
features to be “temporary”, even if we are talking about relatively
long periods of time
Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
CartONG- Humanitarian mapping and information management
<http://www.cartong.org>
Manon Viou
*Coordinatrice projet Missing Maps*
Email: m_v...@cartong.org <mailto:m_v...@cartong.org> | Skype: manon.viou
Phone: +33 (0)4 79 26 28 82 | Mobile: +33 (0)7 83889839
Address: Chambéry, France - Lon: 05°55'24''N | Lat: 45°30'20''E
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
