Hello again Martin,
I agree large and small are quite relative concepts, I proposed to set a threshold to "less than 5 buildings" because it was the easiest way I found. I'm not sure counting people is feasible at least for remote mapping or data integration from NGO or other organisations who don't publicly share population information.
Small refugee sites are in general single structure quite easily distinguishable from a classic refugee camp.
Regards,
I agree large and small are quite relative concepts, I proposed to set a threshold to "less than 5 buildings" because it was the easiest way I found. I'm not sure counting people is feasible at least for remote mapping or data integration from NGO or other organisations who don't publicly share population information.
Small refugee sites are in general single structure quite easily distinguishable from a classic refugee camp.
Regards,
Manon
Le 15 avril 2020 à 11:42, Martin Koppenhoefer < [email protected]> a écrit :
sent from a phone
On 15. Apr 2020, at 10:17, Manon Viou < [email protected]> wrote:
amenity=refugee_site and amenity=social_facility + social_facility=shelter.amenity=refugee_site is for large refugee siteamenity=social_facility and social_facility=shelter is f or small refugee site (less than 5 buildings) and single structure
large is a very relative concept, and counting “buildings or structures is not suitable to distinguish them (you can have 1 person living in a building, or thousands). If we’re to set a kind of threshold I’d rather expect counting people or maybe families/households.
Cheers Martin
Manon Viou
Coordinatrice projet Missing Maps
[email protected] |
manon.viou
+33 (0)4 79 26 28 82 |
+33 (0)7 83889839
Chambéry, France - Lon: 05°55'24''N | Lat: 45°30'20''E
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
