On 6/3/20 1:27 am, Peter Elderson wrote:
Do you know trails with detached sections? We have some in Nederland,
on the islands. Doesn't fit in the proposed role scheme, I think.
How would you get to these 'detached sections"?
If by ferry, would not the ferry trip form part of the route?
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op wo 4 mrt. 2020 om 23:09 schreef Kevin Kenny
<kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com <mailto:kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com>>:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:02 PM Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com
<mailto:pelder...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Maybe someone could try basic roletagging of ways. I will not do
that, because it would take much more time, maintenance and
tooling. I don't foresee mappers in Nederland to do it that way,
but in other countries putting everything in one big relation is
more common.
And here in the US, loops and spurs/branches are either really minor,
or given their own identity. (Even the long alternative to the Long
Path that I discussed is not considered to be "the Long Path", it's
"an acceptable alternative recommended to thru-hikers to avoid the
Orange County road walk, and for which full credit will be given
toward the patch." I wouldn't put it in the relation.)
I've managed the relations for two longish trails, and I don't really
have much use for these features on either one. I don't object to the
proposal, but I really don't have worked examples to contribute! (For
one of those trails, "everything in one big relation" was "a
super-relation containing eleven smaller relations, one per county",
but that's as complicated as it got.)
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
