Hello everyone, What is the status of this proposal? Should we go forward and start voting? Lots of people have added valuable information and insight. It would be a pity if this proposal yet again stays in "Draft" status for forever.
On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 10:15:31 +0000, Michael Behrens <mfbehren...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/hiking_trail_relation_roles > > > > There is no unique way to tag roles in hiking route relations although they > carry a high potential for the rendering of hiking trails. This proposal > was requsted by Sarah Hoffmann on the FOSSGIS conference. A only officially > marked trails should be added to the relations! > > Role nameExplaination > *None* or main The main "normal" roletype for the main section of the > hiking trails. > forward Section of the hiking trail that can only be hiked into the > direction of the way. > backward Section of the hiking trail that can only be hiked against the > direction of the way. > alternative or alternate Tags the members of an alternative path to *main* > path. > excursion Can be used on parts of the trail that leads to a viewpoint, peak > or other. The path has to be hiked back again or else it will be a > *alternative*. > approach A path that is leading from a town, train station / bus station or > parking to main hiking trail or the other way around. > shortcut A trail that shortens the main trail. > > Please write comments here: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/hiking_trail_relation_roles > > Greeting > Michael > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
