Do you know trails with detached sections? We have some in Nederland, on the islands. Doesn't fit in the proposed role scheme, I think.
Vr gr Peter Elderson Op wo 4 mrt. 2020 om 23:09 schreef Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:02 PM Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe someone could try basic roletagging of ways. I will not do that, > because it would take much more time, maintenance and tooling. I don't > foresee mappers in Nederland to do it that way, but in other countries > putting everything in one big relation is more common. > > And here in the US, loops and spurs/branches are either really minor, > or given their own identity. (Even the long alternative to the Long > Path that I discussed is not considered to be "the Long Path", it's > "an acceptable alternative recommended to thru-hikers to avoid the > Orange County road walk, and for which full credit will be given > toward the patch." I wouldn't put it in the relation.) > > I've managed the relations for two longish trails, and I don't really > have much use for these features on either one. I don't object to the > proposal, but I really don't have worked examples to contribute! (For > one of those trails, "everything in one big relation" was "a > super-relation containing eleven smaller relations, one per county", > but that's as complicated as it got.) > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
