On 27/09/19 09:37, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 02:52, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com
<mailto:kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I've also mapped things like 'disused:amenity=prison
landuse=brownfield' for a now-closed prison that the state is trying
to find a buyer to redevelop. The buildings are still standing (and I
understand are for the most part structurally sound), but what would a
buyer do with them?
Legal offices would seem the most appropriate? :-)
Don't know if I'd use landuse=brownfield. Could the buildings be
re-purposed .. and therefore not a brownfield but a construction site?
Going back to the disused / abandoned discussion, is this a good time
to ask about destroyed:?
A tourism establishment in our area has just been destroyed by a
bushfire :-(
It's planned to rebuild on the same spot, so I've marked the existing
tourism=guest_house & amenity=restaurant tags as destroyed:, together
with a "description" note. This has removed them from the map. Is that
the right way of doing it?
The associated camping ground wasn't damaged in any way (beyond losing
power & telephone lines) but is also temporarily closed for "a while"
pending road repairs & re-connection of power etc.
What's the best way of marking that?
For something that can be made functional with a little work - disused:*
I'd add a description tag too.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
